On October 13, 2020, the Supreme Court granted petitions for certiorari filed by the United States (in No. 19-1434), Smith & Nephew, Inc. (in No. 19-1452), and Arthrex, Inc. (in No. 19-1458) regarding the appointments of the administrative patent judges of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.  No date has been set to argue the cases, but the Court consolidated them and allotted one hour for argument time.  Because the Court consolidated the cases for briefing and oral argument, it noted that “future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 19-1434.”

The various petitions were granted only to the extent of “Questions 1 and 2 as set forth in the July 22, 2020 Memorandum for the United States.”  See Orders List at 2.

Question 1 asks “[w]hether, for purposes of the Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. Art. II, § 2, Cl. 2, administrative patent judges of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office are principal officers who must be appointed by the President with the Senate’s advice and consent, or ‘inferior Officers’ whose appointment Congress has permissibly vested in a department head.”

Question 2 asks “[w]hether, if administrative patent judges are principal officers, the court of appeals properly cured any Appointments Clause defect in the current statutory scheme prospectively by severing the application of 5 U.S.C. § 7513(a) to those judges.”

Links to the briefs, and details of the briefing schedule, are below.

No. 19-1434

United States Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (362 pp.)

Memorandum for the United States (also filed in Nos. 19-1452 and 19-1458)

Memorandum in Response for Respondent Arthrex, Inc. (also filed in No. 19-1452)

Brief for Respondents Smith & Nephew, Inc. and Arthrocare Corp. (also filed in No. 19-1458)

Brief of Askeladden L.L.C. as Amicus Curiae in support of petitioner

Amicus Curiae Brief of the New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of petitioner

 

No. 19-1452

Smith & Nephew and Arthrocare Corp. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari

Reply Brief for Petitioners (Smith & Nephew and and Arthrocare Corp.)

Brief for Amicus Curiae Comcast in support of petitioners

 

No. 19-1458

Arthrex, Inc. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (226 pp.)

Reply for Petitioner Arthrex, Inc.

Brief Amicus Curiae on Behalf of US Inventor, Inc. in support of petitioner

Brief Amicus Curiae of TiVo Corporation supporting petitioner

 

Briefing schedule

As set forth in the Court’s Order of October 21, 2020, briefing is set to proceed on the following schedule:

On or before Wednesday, November 25, 2020: Petitioners in Nos. 19-1434 and 19-1452 shall each file an opening brief, limited to 13,000 words.

On or before Wednesday, December 2, 2020: Amicus curiae briefs in support of petitioners in Nos. 19-1434 or 19-1452, or in support of no party, shall be filed, and the briefs shall bear a light green cover.

On or before Wednesday, December 23, 2020: Petitioner in No. 19-1458 shall file a consolidated opening and response brief, limited to 17,000 words.

On or before Wednesday, December 30, 2020: Amicus curiae briefs in support of petitioner in No. 19-1458 shall be filed, and the briefs shall bear a dark green cover.

On or before Friday, January 22, 2021: Petitioners in Nos. 19-1434 and 19-1452 shall each file a consolidated response and reply brief, limited to 14,500 words.

Pursuant to Rule 25.3 of the Rules of the Court,* Petitioner in No. 19-1458 shall file a reply brief, limited to 6,000 words.

*Rule 25.3 recites: “The petitioner or appellant shall file 40 copies of the reply brief, if any, within 30 days after the brief for the respondent or appellee is fled, but any reply brief must actually be received by the Clerk not later than 2 p.m. 10 days before the date of oral argument. Any respondent or appellee supporting the petitioner or appellant may file a reply brief.”